(Logo and goto: Prof. Timo Salmi, Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Vaasa, Finland)
(A thumbnail photo of Timo Salmi)
<http://lipas.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/margin.html>
Copyright © 1990-2010 by Prof. Timo Salmi
Last modified Sat 13-Mar-2010 08:55:22
      (Visits counter image) Counting since 2.11.2005
Prof. Timo Salmi [Offline. For maintenance only.] Prof. Timo Salmi To the home page of the department Accounting and Finance [Offline. For maintenance only.] The home page of the department Accounting and Finance To the home page of the University of Vaasa, Finland [Offline. For maintenance only.] WWW root level
(FAQ)  

Of suitable right margins


Originally from
ftp://garbo.uwasa.fi/pc/link/tsfaqn.zip
Questions from Usenet and Timo's answers


Besides the actual content, of course, proper formatting of your Usenet news postings (the same goes for your email) can significantly enhance the effectiveness and credibility of your postings. Let's consider the issue of suitable right margins for your text.

The right margin (if you pardon the pun): Many users reading the news still have an around 80 column terminal program or are using WWW browser settings at a corresponding width. Consider the implications for your writing. If you use too broad lines, the tails of the lines will be wrapped over to the next line (or be truncated depending on the reader's terminal program settings) making your text difficult or impossible to follow. Your chances of getting good follow-ups or useful answers to the questions, which you may have asked, are radically diminished.
 
But it does not end there. If someone quotes your text with the usual news convention of preceding your text with ">" an overflow can follow even if your text does not originally exceed the 80 column limit. In fact there can be multiple quotes. Hence a suitable maximum right margin wrap in writing to the news is around 72 columns. Note that this problem concerns your signature width as well. Even if quoting signatures is not a good idea, it is often done. Furthermore, when a discussion expands, there could be multi-level quoting (which should not be exaggerated). Your original text, if included, will be gradually shifting to the right.
 
Personally, I have set my editor's wrap at column 69 for the Usenet news when I write. The same goes for my email.



Another, related problem is that some editor and wordprocessor programs do not truly wrap the text paragraphs by default at all. That is, they omit the eoln (end of line) markers even if they seem to change the line on your own screen. Technically, this situation results in very long lines which are hard to handle at the reader's end. Therefore, when you write, it is advisable to ensure that your editor factually is in the wrap mode before sending the message.
 
At worst you might really get automated and manual wrapping mixed up
with
each other. Then your text could look something like this, which would
make
your text resemble unprofessional dabbling. Bear in mind that many
users
read news with fixed-pitch fonts typical in editors, not the
proportional
fonts typical in wordprocessors, and elsewhere on this WWW page.
 
Therefore, indeed use a right margin around column 72 and your lines|
will wrap nicely for the benefit of most of the readers on the      |
Usenet news. The better you are able to physically formulate your   |
text the better everyone can concentrate on what you actually have  |
to say.                                                             |


A good further point from Dr. John Stockton: "Long lines are simply harder to read. Books, magazines, and newspapers set most material to have something like 70 characters per line, certainly not much more (special cases excepted); it is what best suits the human eye."

I don't have the time for this. Why should I bother about my margins and text formulations? Let the reader acquire such a newsreader or email program that takes care of the situation!

A trivial case of self-interest. You probably write to the Usenet news (or send email) in order to be heard by the recipients. You get your message a bit better across if its technical formulation does not render it unintelligible for some or most of the readers. If you don't care what the others think, why do you write in the first place?


(Links)


[To Timo's FAQ materials index page ]
 
[ts(ät)uwasa.fi ] [Photo ] [Programs ] [FAQs ] [Research ] [Lectures ] [Acc&Fin  links ] [Faculty ] [University ]
 
[Revalidate]